However, things could get messy for Carphone Warehouse. The BPI has called their response "irresponsible", and according to the Daily Telegraph, the BPI has threatened them with legal action if they do not comply. Apparently, they sent a fax which says:
"... unless we receive your agreement in writing that within 14 days Carphone Warehouse will implement procedures set out above, we reserve our right to apply to court for injunctions and other relief without further notice to protect our members' rights."This is clearly where the music industry's strategy lies. It has been trying to get agreements of enforcement from ISPs, but the underlying threat has always been legal action. Comply or else.
I hope that the Carphone Warehouse sticks to its guns. For starters, we may get a clear ruling defining ISP liability once and for all. I would also believe that Carphone Warehouse has a good chance of winning the case, which would be more problematic for the music industry than it is for the ISPs. If they fail in this tactic, what will they try next?
Anyway, the BPI are barking up the wrong tree. New research clearly indicates that the problem of sharing music is not an online problem, it is people sharing music with their friends, just as it has always been. We haven't really moved much from the good old days of the mix tape it seems. And then we get Feargal Sharkey telling us that unless this is stopped, musicians will stop making music. Somehow, I do not think so.
Nice post Technollama!
ReplyDeleteThe thing is, even if the ISPs are forced to comply (which would be a shame), piracy wouldn't stop.
It makes me laugh when the entertainment industries seem to think that there will be a "solution" to piracy.
Admittedly I haven't seen the technical details of the traffic monitoring and disconnect policies but I'd imagine they're fairly simple to bypass.
These things always tend to be botched and vulnerabilities would easily be found. Even if you just encrypt your traffic and connect through tor (a popular proxy/onion routing program) they'll find it more difficult to track you, and there's far more that can be done.
Also, I believe they're going to enforce WPA2 encryption on all users with a wireless connection so that we can't claim someone else "hacked" our connection and used it for nefarious purposes. There goes my excuse!
But seriously, this will at best deter a few 13 year olds. It seems to be an exercise in futility.